{"id":2563,"date":"2026-05-25T06:08:06","date_gmt":"2026-05-25T06:08:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/basic-concepts-of-programming-languages-what-every-enterprise-cto-should-know-in-2026\/"},"modified":"2026-05-26T18:41:58","modified_gmt":"2026-05-26T18:41:58","slug":"basic-concepts-of-programming-languages-what-every-enterprise-cto-should-know-in-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/basic-concepts-of-programming-languages-what-every-enterprise-cto-should-know-in-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Basic Concepts of Programming Languages: What Every Enterprise CTO Should Know in 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#programming-paradigms\">Programming Paradigms and Why They Shape Architecture<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#imperative-and-procedural\">Imperative and Procedural<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#object-oriented-programming\">Object-Oriented Programming<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#functional-programming\">Functional Programming<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#declarative-and-domain-specific\">Declarative and Domain-Specific Languages<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#compiled-vs-interpreted-vs-jit\">Compiled vs. Interpreted vs. JIT: What It Means for Your Stack<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#type-systems\">Type Systems: Static, Dynamic, Strong, Weak<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#how-language-choice-affects-your-domain\">How Language Choice Affects Your Product Domain<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#practical-takeaway\">Practical Takeaway for CTOs Evaluating External Teams<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#faqs\">FAQs<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_Language_Fundamentals_Still_Matter_at_the_CTO_Level_why-language-fundamentals-still-matter\"><\/span>Why Language Fundamentals Still Matter at the CTO Level {#why-language-fundamentals-still-matter}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>You are probably not writing production code every day. But you are making decisions that depend on understanding it: hiring engineers, scoping timelines, reviewing architecture proposals, evaluating vendor bids, and deciding when to refactor versus when to rebuild.<\/p>\n<p>When those decisions rest on a shaky grasp of how programming languages actually work, the consequences show up later \u2014 missed deadlines, brittle systems, expensive rewrites.<\/p>\n<p>This is not a beginner tutorial. It is a structured reference for CTOs and technical founders who want a precise, current map of programming language fundamentals and how they connect to real engineering decisions in 2026.<\/p>\n<p>programming language concepts is reshaping how enterprise teams ship software in 2026.<\/p>\n<p>programming language concepts is reshaping how enterprise teams ship software in 2026.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_Is_a_Programming_Language_Really_what-is-a-programming-language\"><\/span>What Is a Programming Language, Really? {#what-is-a-programming-language}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>A programming language is a formal system for expressing instructions that a machine can execute. It defines syntax (the rules for writing valid code), semantics (what that code means and does), and a runtime model (how execution happens in memory and time).<\/p>\n<p>Every language makes tradeoffs: speed versus safety, expressiveness versus predictability, flexibility versus tooling support. Understanding those tradeoffs is what separates a CTO who can evaluate an architecture from one who simply approves it.<\/p>\n<p>Languages also do not exist in isolation. They sit inside ecosystems \u2014 package managers, testing frameworks, deployment tooling, community libraries, security auditing tools. When you choose a language, you are choosing all of that.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Core_Concepts_Every_Language_Shares_core-concepts-every-language-shares\"><\/span>Core Concepts Every Language Shares {#core-concepts-every-language-shares}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Regardless of paradigm, domain, or age, every general-purpose programming language implements a common set of foundational concepts. These are the building blocks your engineers work with every day.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Variables_and_Data_Types_variables-and-data-types\"><\/span>Variables and Data Types {#variables-and-data-types}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>A variable is a named reference to a value stored in memory. Data types define what kind of value that can be: an integer, a floating-point number, a string of text, a boolean, or something more complex.<\/p>\n<p>Type systems vary significantly across languages. Python lets you assign any type to any variable at runtime. Rust requires explicit type declarations and enforces memory ownership at compile time. These are not stylistic differences \u2014 they determine the class of bugs your codebase can contain and how early you catch them.<\/p>\n<p>For enterprise systems processing financial data or medical records, the distinction between a 32-bit integer and a 64-bit integer is not academic. Overflow errors in financial calculations have caused real production incidents.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Control_Flow_control-flow\"><\/span>Control Flow {#control-flow}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Control flow determines the order in which statements execute. The three fundamental mechanisms are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Conditionals<\/strong> (<code>if<\/code>, <code>else<\/code>, <code>switch<\/code>): execute code only when a condition is true<\/li>\n<li><strong>Loops<\/strong> (<code>for<\/code>, <code>while<\/code>, <code>do-while<\/code>): repeat a block until a condition changes<\/li>\n<li><strong>Jumps<\/strong> (<code>return<\/code>, <code>break<\/code>, <code>continue<\/code>, <code>throw<\/code>): redirect execution to a different point in the program<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In concurrent systems, control flow gets more complex. Async\/await patterns, coroutines, and event loops each represent different models for managing execution order when multiple operations run simultaneously. This matters directly when you are building AI pipelines or real-time DeFi protocols where latency and throughput interact.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Functions_and_Scope_functions-and-scope\"><\/span>Functions and Scope {#functions-and-scope}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>A function is a named, reusable block of code that takes inputs and returns an output. Functions are the primary unit of abstraction in most languages.<\/p>\n<p>Scope defines where a variable is visible and accessible. A variable declared inside a function is typically local to it. One declared at the module level may be accessible globally. Poor scope management is one of the most common sources of bugs in large codebases, especially as teams grow and multiple engineers touch the same files.<\/p>\n<p>Closures \u2014 where a function retains access to variables from its enclosing scope even after that scope has exited \u2014 appear in JavaScript, Python, Go, Rust, and most modern languages. They are widely used in callback patterns, event handlers, and functional programming constructs.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Data_Structures_data-structures\"><\/span>Data Structures {#data-structures}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Data structures are organized formats for storing and accessing collections of values. The fundamental ones appear across every language:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Structure<\/th>\n<th>Description<\/th>\n<th>Common Use<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Array \/ List<\/td>\n<td>Ordered sequence of elements<\/td>\n<td>Iteration, indexing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Dictionary \/ Map<\/td>\n<td>Key-value pairs<\/td>\n<td>Lookup tables, configs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Set<\/td>\n<td>Unordered collection of unique values<\/td>\n<td>Deduplication, membership testing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Stack<\/td>\n<td>Last-in, first-out (LIFO)<\/td>\n<td>Call stacks, undo operations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Queue<\/td>\n<td>First-in, first-out (FIFO)<\/td>\n<td>Task scheduling, message passing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Graph<\/td>\n<td>Nodes connected by edges<\/td>\n<td>Dependency resolution, knowledge graphs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tree<\/td>\n<td>Hierarchical node structure<\/td>\n<td>File systems, ASTs, decision trees<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>When your team is building a RAG pipeline, the choice between a vector index and a traditional relational table is a data structure decision with direct performance consequences. When building a DeFi protocol, the gas cost of on-chain storage depends on how your Solidity contract structures its mappings.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Error_Handling_error-handling\"><\/span>Error Handling {#error-handling}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Every program encounters unexpected states. How a language handles errors shapes the reliability of the systems built with it.<\/p>\n<p>Two dominant models exist:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Exceptions<\/strong>: the language throws an error object that propagates up the call stack until caught. Used in Python, Java, C#, and JavaScript.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Return-value errors<\/strong>: functions return either a result or an error value, forcing the caller to handle both explicitly. Used in Go and Rust.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Rust&#39;s <code>Result&lt;T, E&gt;<\/code> type makes error handling mandatory at the type level \u2014 you cannot ignore an error without explicitly discarding it. This is one reason Rust is increasingly used in contexts where correctness is non-negotiable, including smart contract tooling and embedded systems.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Programming_Paradigms_and_Why_They_Shape_Architecture_programming-paradigms\"><\/span>Programming Paradigms and Why They Shape Architecture {#programming-paradigms}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>A paradigm is a fundamental style of programming that shapes how you model problems and organize code. Most modern languages support multiple paradigms, but each has a primary orientation.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Imperative_and_Procedural_imperative-and-procedural\"><\/span>Imperative and Procedural {#imperative-and-procedural}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Imperative programming describes computation as a sequence of statements that change program state. You tell the computer what to do, step by step. Procedural programming organizes those steps into named procedures (functions).<\/p>\n<p>C is the canonical example. Much of the Linux kernel, embedded firmware, and low-level systems software is written this way. The model maps closely to how hardware executes instructions, which makes it efficient but verbose.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Object-Oriented_Programming_object-oriented-programming\"><\/span>Object-Oriented Programming {#object-oriented-programming}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Object-oriented programming (OOP) organizes code around objects \u2014 data structures that bundle state (fields) and behavior (methods) together. The four core principles are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Encapsulation<\/strong>: hiding internal state behind a public interface<\/li>\n<li><strong>Inheritance<\/strong>: deriving new types from existing ones<\/li>\n<li><strong>Polymorphism<\/strong>: treating different types through a common interface<\/li>\n<li><strong>Abstraction<\/strong>: modeling only the relevant details of a concept<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Java, C++, C#, Python, and Kotlin all center on OOP. Enterprise software built in the 2000s and 2010s is predominantly object-oriented. If your team is maintaining or extending legacy systems, this is the paradigm they are working in.<\/p>\n<p>OOP&#39;s weakness is that inheritance hierarchies become rigid and hard to refactor as systems grow. The shift toward composition over inheritance is a direct response to this.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Functional_Programming_functional-programming\"><\/span>Functional Programming {#functional-programming}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Functional programming treats computation as the evaluation of mathematical functions. It avoids shared mutable state and side effects. Key concepts include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Pure functions<\/strong>: given the same inputs, always produce the same output, with no side effects<\/li>\n<li><strong>Immutability<\/strong>: data does not change after creation; you create new data instead<\/li>\n<li><strong>Higher-order functions<\/strong>: functions that take other functions as arguments or return them<\/li>\n<li><strong>Map, filter, reduce<\/strong>: standard operations on collections that replace explicit loops<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Haskell is the purest functional language. Scala, Clojure, and Elixir are functional-first. Python, JavaScript, and Kotlin support functional patterns alongside OOP.<\/p>\n<p>Functional programming is increasingly relevant in 2026 because it simplifies reasoning about concurrent and distributed systems. When multiple processes run simultaneously, mutable shared state is a source of race conditions. Immutability eliminates that class of problem.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Declarative_and_Domain-Specific_Languages_declarative-and-domain-specific\"><\/span>Declarative and Domain-Specific Languages {#declarative-and-domain-specific}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Declarative languages describe what you want, not how to compute it. SQL is the most widely used example: you specify the data you need, and the database engine decides how to retrieve it.<\/p>\n<p>Domain-specific languages (DSLs) are designed for a narrow problem domain. Solidity is a DSL for writing Ethereum smart contracts. HCL is a DSL for infrastructure configuration in Terraform. SPARQL is a DSL for querying RDF knowledge graphs.<\/p>\n<p>As a CTO, you encounter DSLs constantly \u2014 often without labeling them as such. Recognizing that they are languages with their own type systems, semantics, and failure modes helps you evaluate them with appropriate rigor.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Compiled_vs_Interpreted_vs_JIT_What_It_Means_for_Your_Stack_compiled-vs-interpreted-vs-jit\"><\/span>Compiled vs. Interpreted vs. JIT: What It Means for Your Stack {#compiled-vs-interpreted-vs-jit}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>How a language translates source code into machine execution has direct implications for performance, deployment, and debugging.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Compiled languages<\/strong> (C, C++, Rust, Go) translate source code into machine code before execution. The resulting binary runs directly on hardware. Compilation catches type errors and some logic errors before the program ever runs, and binaries are fast and portable within a target architecture.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Interpreted languages<\/strong> (Python, Ruby, early JavaScript) execute source code line by line at runtime through an interpreter. There is no separate compilation step, which makes iteration fast but execution slower \u2014 and some errors only surface when a specific code path runs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>JIT-compiled languages<\/strong> (Java via the JVM, JavaScript via V8, C# via .NET CLR) compile code at runtime, just before execution. The JIT compiler can optimize based on actual runtime behavior, often achieving performance close to ahead-of-time compiled code while retaining some flexibility of interpretation.<\/p>\n<p>For AI workloads in 2026, Python dominates the data science and ML ecosystem, but production inference frequently moves to ONNX, TensorRT, or compiled C++ extensions for performance. Your engineers are likely writing Python that calls compiled libraries underneath. Understanding this layering helps you evaluate performance claims and identify bottlenecks accurately.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Type_Systems_Static_Dynamic_Strong_Weak_type-systems\"><\/span>Type Systems: Static, Dynamic, Strong, Weak {#type-systems}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Type systems are one of the most consequential design decisions in any language. Two axes matter:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Static vs. Dynamic typing:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Static: types are checked at compile time (Java, TypeScript, Rust, Go). Errors surface before deployment.<\/li>\n<li>Dynamic: types are checked at runtime (Python, JavaScript, Ruby). More flexible, but type errors can reach production.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Strong vs. Weak typing:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Strong: the language enforces type rules strictly and does not implicitly convert between incompatible types (Python, Rust).<\/li>\n<li>Weak: the language allows implicit type coercion (JavaScript, C). <code>&quot;5&quot; + 3<\/code> evaluates to <code>&quot;53&quot;<\/code> in JavaScript and raises a TypeError in Python.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>TypeScript emerged specifically to add static typing to JavaScript, and its adoption in enterprise frontend and backend development has grown substantially. In 2026, TypeScript is effectively the default for serious Node.js applications.<\/p>\n<p>For smart contract development in Solidity, the type system is statically typed with explicit integer sizes. A <code>uint256<\/code> and a <code>uint128<\/code> are different types. Mishandling numeric types in a smart contract is not just a bug \u2014 it is a potential exploit.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_Language_Choice_Affects_Your_Product_Domain_how-language-choice-affects-your-domain\"><\/span>How Language Choice Affects Your Product Domain {#how-language-choice-affects-your-domain}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Language selection is not neutral. Each domain has converged on specific languages for reasons tied to performance, ecosystem maturity, and community tooling.<\/p>\n<p><strong>AI and ML engineering<\/strong>: Python is the primary language for model development, training pipelines, and LLM integration. PyTorch and TensorFlow are Python-first. Production inference often uses C++ or CUDA extensions. MLOps tooling \u2014 MLflow, Kubeflow \u2014 is Python-centric.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Web3 and smart contracts<\/strong>: Solidity is the dominant language for EVM-compatible chains including Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, and zkSync. Rust is used for Solana programs and increasingly for Substrate-based chains. FunC and Tact are used for TON smart contracts.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Biotech and medical software<\/strong>: Python dominates bioinformatics (BioPython, NumPy, SciPy). R is used for statistical analysis. Medical imaging software often uses C++ or Java for performance-critical processing, with Python wrappers for the analysis layer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Enterprise backend systems<\/strong>: Java and C# remain dominant in large enterprises. Go has gained significant ground for microservices and infrastructure tooling. Kotlin is replacing Java on Android and in some backend contexts.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cloud and infrastructure<\/strong>: Go is the language of cloud-native infrastructure \u2014 Kubernetes, Docker, and Terraform providers are all written in it. Bash and Python handle scripting. HCL and YAML are the configuration languages of infrastructure as code.<\/p>\n<p>When you evaluate an external engineering team, asking which languages they work in daily \u2014 not just which they list on a services page \u2014 tells you a great deal about their actual depth.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Practical_Takeaway_for_CTOs_Evaluating_External_Teams_practical-takeaway\"><\/span>Practical Takeaway for CTOs Evaluating External Teams {#practical-takeaway}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Understanding programming language fundamentals sharpens your judgment in three specific areas:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. Evaluating architecture proposals.<\/strong> When a vendor proposes microservices in Go versus a monolith in Python, you can ask informed questions about the tradeoffs: deployment complexity, type safety, concurrency model, and hiring implications.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. Scoping technical risk.<\/strong> A Solidity smart contract with unchecked arithmetic is a different category of risk than a Python web app with the same bug. Language-level understanding helps you calibrate which risks need external audit and which are addressable in code review.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. Hiring and team assessment.<\/strong> A senior Rust engineer and a senior Python engineer are not interchangeable. Knowing what each language demands helps you evaluate whether a candidate&#39;s claimed experience is plausible and whether your team composition matches your technical roadmap.<\/p>\n<p>If your product sits at the intersection of multiple domains \u2014 an AI-powered DeFi protocol, a blockchain-secured biotech data pipeline \u2014 you need engineers who are fluent across multiple language ecosystems. That combination is rare, and it is worth testing carefully before committing to a development partner.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\">Oqtacore<\/a> builds across AI, Web3, and biotech using the specific language stacks each domain demands, with the same team carrying work from prototype through production deployment.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"FAQs_faqs\"><\/span>FAQs {#faqs}<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><strong>What is the basic concept of a programming language?<\/strong><br \/>A programming language is a formal system for writing instructions that a computer can execute. It defines syntax (rules for valid code), semantics (what the code does), and a runtime model (how execution happens). Every language makes tradeoffs between performance, safety, expressiveness, and ecosystem support.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What are the most important concepts to understand in any programming language?<\/strong><br \/>The foundational concepts are variables and data types, control flow (conditionals and loops), functions and scope, data structures, and error handling. These appear in every general-purpose language and form the basis for understanding how any codebase works.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What is the difference between compiled and interpreted languages?<\/strong><br \/>Compiled languages translate source code into machine code before execution, catching errors early and producing fast binaries. Interpreted languages execute source code at runtime through an interpreter, enabling faster iteration but slower execution and later error detection. JIT-compiled languages combine both approaches by compiling code at runtime.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Why does the type system matter for enterprise software?<\/strong><br \/>Type systems determine when and how errors are caught. Static typing surfaces type errors at compile time, before deployment. Dynamic typing defers those checks to runtime, where errors can reach production. For financial systems, medical software, and smart contracts, static typing reduces the risk of costly runtime failures.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What programming languages are most relevant for AI development in 2026?<\/strong><br \/>Python is the primary language for AI and ML engineering, covering model training, LLM integration, RAG pipelines, and MLOps. Production inference often moves to C++ or CUDA extensions for performance. TypeScript and Go are common in the API and infrastructure layers surrounding AI systems.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What language is used to write smart contracts?<\/strong><br \/>Solidity is the dominant language for EVM-compatible smart contracts on Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, zkSync, and BNB Chain. Rust is used for Solana programs and Substrate-based chains. FunC and Tact are used for TON. Each has its own type system and security considerations that differ substantially from general-purpose languages.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How should a CTO use knowledge of programming languages when evaluating vendors?<\/strong><br \/>Focus on three things: whether the vendor&#39;s proposed language choices match the performance and safety requirements of your domain, whether their engineers demonstrate fluency in the specific ecosystems your product requires, and whether they can articulate the tradeoffs of their choices rather than defaulting to generic answers. Specificity in language discussion is a reliable signal of genuine depth.<\/p>\n<p>The fundamentals covered here are not trivia. They are the vocabulary you need to evaluate proposals, challenge assumptions, and make decisions that hold up under engineering scrutiny. If your product roadmap requires serious work across AI, Web3, or biotech, the team you choose needs to be fluent in the language ecosystems those domains actually run on. That is a concrete, testable standard \u2014 and it is the right one to apply.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Programming Paradigms and Why They Shape Architecture Imperative and Procedural Object-Oriented Programming Functional Programming Declarative and Domain-Specific Languages Compiled vs. Interpreted vs. JIT: What It Means for Your Stack Type Systems: Static, Dynamic, Strong, Weak How Language Choice Affects Your Product Domain Practical Takeaway for CTOs Evaluating External Teams FAQs Why Language Fundamentals Still Matter [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2562,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_mo_disable_npp":"","yasr_overall_rating":0,"yasr_post_is_review":"","yasr_auto_insert_disabled":"","yasr_review_type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2563","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured-articles"],"acf":{"image":2562},"yasr_visitor_votes":{"number_of_votes":0,"sum_votes":0,"stars_attributes":{"read_only":false,"span_bottom":false}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2563","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2563"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2563\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2585,"href":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2563\/revisions\/2585"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2562"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2563"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2563"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oqtacore.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2563"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}